this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
137 points (69.2% liked)

Privacy

39507 readers
880 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 153 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah.

The columns are squished together so the titles are basically one word and the data creates a ton of empty space. The colors should be lighter shades. White on yellow is just annoying. The row separators don't extend to the row header, so it is easy to get lost when trying to compare the actual data.

My eyes just get confused and nope out.

[–] TrustingZebra@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Also the actual diagram is bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Brave Search fully using their own index since April 27, 2023. But they refuse to identify their crawler and rely on googlebot if sites want to be excluded. Also their search API monetization of possible copyrighted content while understandable is a bit doubious due to their public stance on transparency.

StartPage also blocks VPN usage.

DuckDuckGo by their own admission now re-rank "trusted" sites to the top when it comes to what they clasify as"misinformation" so calling their "censorship" mild is huge understatement.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I wanted to search for unverified info or misinfo, I could, but almost always I am lookkng for factual and sourced information. Please don't force me to do otherwise.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

It's more about someone else making the decision on what is "trustworthy" for you

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (7 children)

StartPage also blocks VPN usage.

Only accidental I think. They have the option of reporting that you're behind a VPN proxy when it happens.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Interesting that you're doing a search engine comparison, and not add google into that comparison. Also, there are no sources at all, so we can't verify any of it, and I know that some of that data is incorrect. Sources would help us (the end user) determine whether our data is incorrect or yours is incorrect due to poor sources. Leaving out the sources, means this chart is actually rather pointless, because it can't be verified (as correct or incorrect).

E: also, ignoring cloudflare with this statement and zero explanation, removes author credibility. Either explain exactly why "cloudflare so who cares lol" or don't include that section at all.

This chart reminds me of this, which was actually quoted in a presentation as an actual quote...

[–] witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The chart source is from here: https://digdeeper.club/articles/search.xhtml

Cloudflare makes you activate cookies and JavaScript, which serves to deanonymize you.

[–] A_Porcupine@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I couldn't quite believe the Cloudflare thing, so I loaded up a new Firefox profile, disabled all cookies, and disabled JavaScript and accessed one of my websites that sits behind cloudflare and... It worked just fine.

Do you have more info on that? Is it only in certain cases?

[–] witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I believe it's only when they have anti-ddos enabled or CF thinks you're a bot, it makes you resolve a captcha (sometimes), and that requires cookies and JS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flumph@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It was made by an edgelord for edgelords.

CuckCuckGo belongs in the trash instead.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

shouldn’t that category be “SearXNG” instead of “SearX”? – SearX went into maintenance mode a year ago and then archived their code last week – searx.space isn’t even bothering to list SearX instances anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] czech@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (10 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just love what has become of this thread:

  • Think it's a nice post
  • Look for Google/Kagi, but they're missing
  • People ask for sources, realize OP has chart from VERY dodgy conspiracy website
  • People start accusing Kagi Support of lying to their face, Screenshota of convo attached
  • Other users don't think its a lie, rather a misunderstanding
  • Insults start
  • ?
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azurefirefly@lemmy.basedcount.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ollie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

bad in the sense that its 1 (american) company that controls a hellala lot of the internet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adramis@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Are the Ecosia results up to date? They used to be great, but awhile ago they changed something and it's been hot garbage since. I still use them because trees, but I usually search with Ecosia, don't see what I want, and then have to use another search engine.

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why is Brave Search considered as heavily censored?

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because it doesn't show the conspiracy theory enhancing the authors conspiracy anti-covid/anti-moon landing opinion :

meaning you will never find the truth about the moon landing or COVID vaccines there even if the query asks for exactly that. What you will find - though - is a bunch of irrelevant "fact check" or "science loving" sites, or ones shitting on "conspiracy theorists".

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Ahhh that's reasonable. Thank you for the info!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Today I learned WebCrawler still exists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nifty. Did you make this op?

[–] witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] AWildMimicAppears@kbin.social 62 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

after looking around on that site, i deeply mistrust the original author about probably everything. using the search term "christchurch shooting was faked" and arguing that the search results attack conspiracy theories, which means that there is censoring going on - that does not fit my definition of sanity.

e: ah, and the moon landing was fake and covid shots are evil. dudes, this guy is nuts, dont even take the time of the day from him.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wtf. Didn't even have to go too far. Here in the brave section

meaning you will never find the truth about the moon landing or COVID vaccines there even if the query asks for exactly that. What you will find - though - is a bunch of irrelevant "fact check" or "science loving" sites, or ones shitting on "conspiracy theorists".

WTF is wrong with this person.

This "article" is about spreading search engine for people doing "their own research" and making the US look stupid on TV or something.

I am for no "censorship", however sometimes it is needed, because as for the example of the vaccines or moonlanding, people may je mislead, then search s* online and get a trash conspiracy article which enhances that stupid opinion. In this case there needs to be a way to spread good information.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I heard Naomi Klein say that conspiracy theories are the socialism of fools.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Do you have this in ods, csv or at least xlsx?

[–] Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

God, this is what I love about Lemmy: Someome posts a chart and immediately the question for raw data arises. And the order: First .ods, the free spreasheet format, then .csv with the mindset of "Fine, I'll import the raw csv myself", and as anlast resort the hated .xlsx proprietary format. Never change, and use .od_

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There is something that is irrefutable that sadly google has the best algorithm and most crawled information. So it has by far the best results using it correctly with parameters. Sometimes I fall to use it but i take my precautions like in a separate container using Firefox Multi account containers and some other stuff

[–] mintyfrog@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

It's refutable, and also you can use Google's results through a different search engine, like SearXNG

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Source? How is possible that Startpage is listed as Censorship: Extreme?

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Startpage is Google but proxied. And Google has extreme censorship.

[–] Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

What is Metager?

Excite still exists?

load more comments
view more: next ›