this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8683 readers
261 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't really apply in this case.

TSMC charges per wafer. If yield improves, that means each wafer will have higher quality chips, on average. Which could mean less junk chips and/or more chips that will make it to a higher bin (which could mean more speed or less that needs to be fused off due to a flaw).

Also, you're not the customer they are talking about. They mean their customers, like Apple, AMD, Nvidia, etc.

Though you might see some savings because higher yields means inventory levels increase, which could mean a lower optimal price on the supply/demand curve. Even if the MSRP is lower than the optimal price, it would still mean less opportunity to scalp the chips for profit.

[โ€“] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago

They mean their customers, like Apple, AMD, Nvidia, etc.

So these guys will make more affordable products... Right?

which could mean a lower optimal price on the supply/demand curve.

Not when everything is controlled by oligopolies but sure it "could"