this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8683 readers
607 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] moody@lemmings.world 13 points 16 hours ago

TSMC's customers being multinational corporations, not end users.

[โ€“] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That ain't how pricing works... Corpo always charges the max it can get away with.

Cost structure is a secondary factor in pricing.

About time plebs got a clue... Just fucking look at your grocery store lol

Government created these monopolies and daddy Sam let's them fuck us๐Ÿคก

But hey TSMC needs us taxpyer money;)

[โ€“] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't really apply in this case.

TSMC charges per wafer. If yield improves, that means each wafer will have higher quality chips, on average. Which could mean less junk chips and/or more chips that will make it to a higher bin (which could mean more speed or less that needs to be fused off due to a flaw).

Also, you're not the customer they are talking about. They mean their customers, like Apple, AMD, Nvidia, etc.

Though you might see some savings because higher yields means inventory levels increase, which could mean a lower optimal price on the supply/demand curve. Even if the MSRP is lower than the optimal price, it would still mean less opportunity to scalp the chips for profit.

[โ€“] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 16 hours ago

They mean their customers, like Apple, AMD, Nvidia, etc.

So these guys will make more affordable products... Right?

which could mean a lower optimal price on the supply/demand curve.

Not when everything is controlled by oligopolies but sure it "could"

[โ€“] alessandro@lemmy.ca 0 points 18 hours ago

billions of saving for (expected) billions of customers: "best I can do is a buck"