this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
426 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36188 readers
1561 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let's be civil.

And if you're a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yes. I have no sympathy for the CEO but murder is still murder

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is it though? The US still has the death penalty, and the person who commits those killings just gets paid and goes home.

And none of those people of death row are responsible for even a small fraction of the evil private health insurers are capable of.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

That's not murder. By definition. Killing does not equal murder

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then he should of already faced the death penalty for the thousands (millions?) of deaths he caused.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can argue the morality of the situation all you like, but that circumstance doesn't constitute murder. People in the military can kill thousands without legally being a murderer

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The laws are designed to allow murdering the poor. That doesn't make it "not murder". When you deny live-saving treatment out of profit considerations, that is both premeditated and killing out of greed. There's two murder criteria right there.

If the laws are designed for the elite, it is very stupid to argue morality based on what's "lawful" and what is illegal.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't making that argument

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Think of it this way. Based on the fact that today far fewer claims are being denied. He might have already saved hundreds of lives.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, is that true, or just your speculation? Are there public data of number of denials per day?

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was a post here from a pharmacist who noticed claim denials evaporated over night

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 weeks ago

If true, that's very interesting. A very practical result