this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
72 points (93.9% liked)
Asklemmy
44171 readers
1545 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wouldn't proof that we're in a simulation also mean pretty concrete proof that there's no afterlife or any form of continuation of consciousness when we die?
Like, I doubt your virtual machines go to heaven when you close them.
If life is a simulation, afterlife can be simulated as well.
Yeah but could they be saved and restarted? Or better yet, restarted from an earlier save but with access to older saves?
ever reach behind your head and try to pull somthing out?
Why would an optimization make things more complicated? The point of optimizations in any simulation is to simplify the complexity of the computation. The entire reason why there is a multi-billionaire industry to research quantum computers is because they are exponentially more difficult to simulate than classical physics, so they are not practical to simulate on a classical computer. Seems weird to me that a simulator would "optimize" things by making them enormously more complex.
Why are we assuming they'd want to optimize it? If they went through the trouble of simulating the entire universe, they probably either have a particular goal in mind, or have such a ludicrously large amount of resources that it doesn't matter.
Do you even need quantum mechanics to make that argument, then? You're basically saying weak emergence is evidence of being in a simulation because you can approximate nature much simpler when "zoomed out." It seems like even if we did not have quantum mechanics you could still make that argument.
So many skibidi vibes here man, it was all vibes rizzing up this place and until I came and unvibed everything. The vibes are so joever vro I was just mogged. ๐