this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
74 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9808 readers
31 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This one isn't directly about cars, but it does go some way to explaining the mentality of people that buy giant trucks that have never been used for any sort of work. That is, people who live in cities but identify as "rural" people.

Academic sources linked in the video:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't watched the video yet, but my thought has always been that that mentality is simply privilege and entitlement. They think they deserve to eat their cake and have it too (to get both the easy access to amenities of the city and the private space of rural living) while forcing society to subsidize it for them via policies like single-family zoning, mandatory parking minimums, and "free" parking.

(And yes, BTW, single-family zoning is a subsidy! It artificially inflates the supply, driving the price down compared to what it should be, while driving the price of multifamily housing up. Even if you think single-family houses are unaffordable, that doesn't disprove it -- they're still cheaper than if homeowners were made to compete fairly with multifamily developers who would build those properties out to their highest and best use. Nobody should expect to be able to live in a single-family house in a city, just as a simple matter of geometry, and it's an outrage that that lifestyle is forced by policy at everybody else's expense.)

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No neighbourhood should cost more to maintain than it generates in taxes (unless it is specifically low income housing). Nearly every suburb is financially unsustainable.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Rural states are financially unsustainable.

Texas doesn't having zoning, but still an ocean of single family homes. thats what sells, and multifamily homes need to be near services and foot traffic to be in demand.

i'm surprised the giant companies buying up many thousands of houses don't rent them out by room.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

you wana know how we can reduce all those single family home oceans? we make them pay for their own infrastructure

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds like texas should fix their zoning code. These problems have been decades in the making, but it seems every politician and city wants to keep that status quo and keep the suburban scam going, even as north america is in a housing crisis with an ever increasing bubble. Nobody is brave enough to pop or even deflate the bubble