this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
331 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This still baffles me. What's Facebook's end game here? They are built on data collection and spying, but they own an app that is E2EE.

[–] Loce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

If you go only by the metadata, they know all your friends, their phone numbers, your location history, when do you chat, with whom, how often and how long. And I'm fairly sure they index conversation in some form.

Just location history can paint a decent picture of what you do, where do you go, what do you like, which friends are nearby, etc... and all of that was implemented like 15+ years ago, imagine what they can do today with AI. It's fair to say FB knows more about you then you do (FB, IG, Wapp...). And to be blunt, it could probably determine what ppls shit smells like, judging by all the pictures of a meal they post on IG.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I think they just saw that Whatsapp was becoming the standard chat app for basically all of the world outside of the US and China, and just didn't want anybody else to have it.

Additionally, metadata is better than no data, I guess.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 week ago

Meta data is prolly more valuable at scale...

Most of are really generic so any single normie data package has but so much value. Middling income with middle hobbies etc

However, having data on 330 million pedons along with each ones connections, thats power.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The metadata. The message content is E2E, but the data about the content isn’t necessarily e2e.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good point. Figuring out who is talking to who is valuable info for them too.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 week ago

Meta data is more valuable than whatever is being discussed most of the time