this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
331 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
3170 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 241 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think teens abandoned Facebook like 10 years ago

[–] protist@mander.xyz 94 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Surely longer ago than that? Facebook hasn't been cool for probably over 15 years

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Has FB been cool since they got rid of signups limited by .edu email addresses?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That was basically the end. When it was only friends and the feed sorted by "new,", it was super fun. When my aunts started joining it became much less fun.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

the feed sorted by “new,”

Yeah, and it went from "let's just add some stuff" to outright "we will force feed you this slop and you will like it" from there. It felt like you were a goose being prepped for Christmas' foie gras.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

That's when it was cool to teens who didn't have .edu emails addresses (but not long after).

No, because that's when the olds took it over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It went downhill when poking and sheep throwing went away.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Poking is still there. I'm trying to bring it back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 94 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because Whatsapp is totally not owned by FB.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s not about why owns it. It’s about where young people can be without getting bothered by their parents and other old people.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm 41.....you telling me the kids today don't think of me as the greatest person who ever existed??? Pssshhh that's malarkey! I won't hear of it! EVERYONE thinks I'm the greatest person who ever existed! My lexicon includes words like "malarkey" and "lexicon"! Kids think that's cool right???

[–] NutsGate@feddit.nl 30 points 1 week ago

I'm 39 so I am slightly more rizz than you. I maintain my levels of brat by regularly updating my skibidi vocab.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Yo, your lexicon is making my malarkey happy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 87 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Where there any teens on Twitter? Last I was there it was full of angry middle-age men.

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago

before musk came it was pretty full, most of them have moved to threads

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Ah, the curse of algorithmic social network. It’s full of angry middle-aged men if you follow those / interact with them. There are / were big communities formed around various pop stars on Twitter and those are quite different demographics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's pretty clear. Facebook is now full of crap created by artificial intelligence (and not only).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 47 points 1 week ago

That is a weird way of describing it. Teens aren't "abandoning" FB & X; they never signed up to begin with. And why would that? They are platforms built for and filled with millennials+.

[–] chr@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A decade ago is when teens stopped using Facebook, unless they're counting Instagram in those metrics?

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago

then they would have to count WhatsApp too...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't whatsapp another data mining app for Facebook?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, although to nowhere near the same extent as Facebook and Instagram.

The chats are E2EE using Signal's encryption protocol, so very good.

But they will certainly mine everything else they can get. They may not know what you're saying, but they do know who you're talking to, when you're doing it, your contacts, your profile pic, how often you send images, etc. any web links with tracking info embedded in the URL will likely be tracked too, once you open them.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 week ago

E2EE doesn't mean that the developer/company can't be a member of the "ends" in "End-to-end encryption". WhatsApp is closed-source, so nobody can really confirm which E2EE algorithm is at play. However, considering that the E2EE is the implementation of a known E2EE algorithm, such algorithms often support more than two keys (hence, more than two people), so, a third-key from Charlie can be part of the conversation, unbeknownst to Alice and Bob. If Meta would inject their own key inside every WhatsApp conversation, they could effectively read things.

For example: GPG/PGP support multiple public keys, so the same encrypted message can be decrypted by any private keys belonging to those public keys. Alice can send a message to both Bob, Charlie and Douglas, collectively specifying their public keys at the moment of the encryption. Then, the exact same payload would be sent to them, and they would use their own private keys to decrypt the message.

So, let's suppose that a closed-source messaging app company/developer had their own pair of public and private keys, and they public key is injected in every conversation made through their app. They'd also obfuscate it from the UI so the UI won't show the hardcoded "third-party". This way they could easily read every single message being exchanged through their app. It's like TSA with a "master key" that can open everyone's travelling bags, no matter where you bought the travelling bag.

Even Signal may have this. Yeah, libsignal is "open-source", but the app isn't. What if their app had some hardcoded public key from Signal team? The only trustworthy E2EE is encoding it yourself using OpenPGP and similar. And if one is more privacy-worried than me, there are projects such as the "Tinfoil Chat" which is almost-immune to eavesdropping, involving optocoupled (hence, airgapped) circuitry, separate machines for networking, decryption and encryption, Onion-routing, and so on.

In summary: nobody should trust out-of-the-box E2EE, especially those hidden within a closed-source app.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This still baffles me. What's Facebook's end game here? They are built on data collection and spying, but they own an app that is E2EE.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I think they just saw that Whatsapp was becoming the standard chat app for basically all of the world outside of the US and China, and just didn't want anybody else to have it.

Additionally, metadata is better than no data, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Loce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

If you go only by the metadata, they know all your friends, their phone numbers, your location history, when do you chat, with whom, how often and how long. And I'm fairly sure they index conversation in some form.

Just location history can paint a decent picture of what you do, where do you go, what do you like, which friends are nearby, etc... and all of that was implemented like 15+ years ago, imagine what they can do today with AI. It's fair to say FB knows more about you then you do (FB, IG, Wapp...). And to be blunt, it could probably determine what ppls shit smells like, judging by all the pictures of a meal they post on IG.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Ok, I feel old. The only reason facebook has any relevance to me is the market place. What’s the best alternative?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

That's just it, Facebook is kinda the default option, and almost everyone has an account there. It's why so many clubs arrange everything through a Facebook page.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay? But what does Whatsapp has anything to do with the other? DM?

I don't consider WhatsApp social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My family has a signal group. I started it two years ago.

Almost no one pays any attention to it, unless they accidentally open the app once a month, but they're all still there and can be spoken to.

I put a PSA out a month ago that I'll no longer respond on Facebook Messenger or SMS after the turn of the year. Tough shit. There was some groaning but, if there's no other way, either use Signal or invest in a Pigeon coop and get training.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

This is news? The article’s own graph puts this about 6 years ago

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

WhatsApp? The instant messenger boomers use on their phones?

Damn, who saw that coming.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 week ago

american, right? It's very popular in other places.

[–] cestvrai@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most countries stopped using SMS ages ago. WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram are ubiquitous.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I WISH signal was ubiquitous. Half of my friends are still using Facebook Messenger so I still have to resort to using SMS for them

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Spotted the iMessage user who routinly cries about dot colour

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In most of Europe WhatsApp is synonymous with text messaging.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Weird, considering facebook does all the shit those other sites do.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

People go where their friends are. Their grandparents are on Facebook.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 5 points 1 week ago

How else you gonna cyber bully the transfer student

[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

well Facebook still owns them and will own them when they all switch to instagram reels like America wants them to do

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gee I wish they had just left Facebook as a way to share photos and updates with friends and family, instead of turning it into a viral content clusterfuck to capture the youth audience. It didn’t even work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arararagi@ani.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No teens on blue sky, nice

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SteveDinn@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I guess I'll never know what the kids are saying ever again because there's no way I'm installing either of those apps.

load more comments
view more: next ›