this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
223 points (98.3% liked)

Work Reform

9830 readers
1771 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Retirees and employees at Disney World are losing their perks under the new district board, which says benefits like park passes are unethical.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OBEY. DO NOT RESIST. OBEY.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That pastor may want to reread the Bible. Jesus was a rabble rouser.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

-----ians dgaf about Jesus. He's a mascot, they worship Paul.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh.

Anti-Roman imperialist.

Pro Jewish theocracy.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

The Jewish theocracy was involved in his murder. So, he apparently said and did a lot of things they didn't agree with.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the opposite of what the biblical Jesus did.

Says pay taxes to Rome.

Calls religious leaders a brood of vipers.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, he pointed to Roman denari in a time when the area used multiple forms of coinage, including their own shekels, and said to a Roman spy to "Render unto Caesar's what is Caesar's," and was eventually executed for treason and being generally obnoxious to the Romans. He also routinely called out religious corruption while demonstrating perfect knowledge of religious law, which, by the way, would have included extremely clear penalties for accepting the Roman Emperor as a god, refusal to do so being treason in the empire.

A skeptical sort might note that, to a rebellious territory that would launch a massive, religiously rooted revolt a few decades after his assumed death, while his new cult had spread like wildfire, "What is Caesar's" might have two answers to a conquered subject and a Roman.

You might also ask yourself if the Roman Church might have downplayed certain aspects of his life while proselytizing and becoming part of the imperial establishment.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, you’re making things up. Cool.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Bootlicker? Did the Romans wear boots?