this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
72 points (78.6% liked)

politics

19243 readers
1719 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Green energy, EV investment, union empowerment (inb4), student debt relief marijuana pardons and likely rescheduling, infrastructure, drug price controls, Chips act, PACT act, non-competes banned (by FTC along 'party lines'), pardoning people kicked out of military for being gay, supporting Ukraine, etc, etc.

People saying he didn't do anything have their head in the sand.

Is this where we cue "but he didn't do everything, everywhere, all at once"?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

inb4

You lost me the moment you thought the strikes were only about sick days. Look up the unions' demand and you'll see that sick days were only one of many, and Biden still gave them less of those than they demanded.

Edit: Typo.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

And then when the amazon strikers were being illegally arrested by the cops the other day Biden didnt do a damned thing.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think people are more upset about the net change. Marijuana pardons, but he also pardoned someone who embezzled millions, as well as Hunter (after saying he wouldn't). He also showed no sympathy for union workers, like when he signed return to work for striking rail workers.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

and likely rescheduling

Cannabis is still Schedule I.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Going to copy paste my comment from elsewhere


He started the process for medical marijuana legalization in 2022 via rescheduling to schedule 3 (Harris had called for full legalization, Biden only called for medical). It's not as simple as a singular executive order when done without congressional action alone. The existing law makes the process very convoluted to reschedule. Lots of steps inbetween with people that have actively tried to slow it down

The formal rule for it ended up being fully proposed in May 2024, and the DEA has dragged it out and kept delaying it. The DEA managed to push the inital first hearing out until Dec 2nd and there keep being legal challenges from outside groups to push it back further and further


Dems also tried getting it through via legislation which is much faster. Passed in the house but it died in the senate

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3617

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So why'd he fuck off until 2022 instead of starting it on Inauguration Day?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dems also tried getting it through via legislation which is much faster. Passed in the house but it died in the senate

Gee. How could that have happened in the Senate that Democrats controlled at the time?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The filibuster, which Biden did try to push for removal in certain areas. Joe Manchin and Sinema wouldn't budge on it

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We gave Democrats a majority. We gave them the opportunity. They didn't do what we elected them to do.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Joe Manchin is barely a democrat - though he's probably the best you'd get out of West Virginia. In other parts of the world, he'd be a different party and he's already left the Democratic party

Look, Biden could have just gone home, blamed Manchin, called it a day on so many issues but he didn't. He actually tried to do what he could via executive action in many areas. He got zero credit for quite significant legislation and executive action

He managed to get one of the largest US climate bill through (Inflation Reduction Act), large infrastructure investments, etc.

Biden has many many faults. You don't need to claim there's ones in the areas where he did really try and got only shit on for it

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Joe Manchin is barely a democrat

Joe Manchin's obstruction is the last word people got from the Democratic Party on a host of issues.

Look, Biden could have just gone home, blamed Manchin, called it a day on so many issues but he didn’t.

Like he did with most of BBB, yes.

He got zero credit for quite significant legislation and executive action

That's what happens when you spend decades being on the wrong side of issues, as Biden was with both cannabis and student loans. You don't get credit for slapping a tiny store-brand bandaid over the problems you made a career out of creating and exacerbating. Especially when the tiny store-brand bandaid falls off.

He managed to get one of the largest US climate bill through (Inflation Reduction Act)

Centrists really overestimate the popularity of that law. Sometimes they wait a whole other sentence before gloating about record oil production.

Biden has many many faults. You don’t need to claim there’s ones in the areas where he did really try and got only shit on for it

His other faults make me disinclined to carry water for him.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

He said he was in favor of removing the fillibuster only for two votes. For everything else he was flatly against eliminating it. He was all for keeping the filibuster in place when republicans regularly held the government hostage on budget bills to. Why did he take the republican side on that? No one knows. It makes no sense.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/21/biden-nothing-done-filibuster-abolished-500502

Did he do some things? Sure.

Did he do nearly enough? No.