Privacy

32471 readers

349 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

192

Curated list of banking app support for GrapheneOS (privsec.dev)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by kchr@lemmy.sdf.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For those that are looking to install GrapheneOS and want to ensure that their banking apps work as intended, here is a curated list with app compability status per country.

Each entry also lists required settings, profile and whether they need access to Google Play services, among other details.

Update on 2024-12-23: The following site is a great resource as well, it provides details on MFA support for various services grouped by country (not only banking): https://2fa.directory/

Thank you @jagged_circle@feddit.nl for the suggestion!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Shouldn't we also have the opposite list; a sort of name and shame or if you use these banks, you're screwed list?

In part, because it can be more conclusive to take a bank that has consciously made the decision to block access, rather than having a list of banks that maybe just haven't gotten around to it yet.

[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure because a bank being absent from such a list could either mean the compatibility is known to be functional or unknown. And that's very different and I would argue a very critical difference.

As a user I would definitely care most about a list of functional banks and that is what we have. What you propose, while it has its value, would not be actionable to users due to the ambiguity I raised above.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

You may have missed "also." The comment does not suggest replacing the current list.

Worth noting, the existing list dies actually appear to cover both known working and known not working apps - apps that do not work have their names given in ~~strikethrough~~.