this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
77 points (86.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3605 readers
536 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 107 points 3 days ago (11 children)

One can interpret the maps as: Rural children are diagnosed less than children in large cities

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't know, a lot of the red is over pretty rural areas in the south and parts of the southwest, and the majority of the most rural parts of the country are "not significant".

Also that big blue part in the middle covers some very large cities.

[–] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 5 points 2 days ago

The 'not significant' part could be due to low numbers in general, so they can't get the variances small enough to get low p numbers. It's a quote that I can't quite remember perfectly that is well known in sociology/psychology: "The only reason our findings aren't significant is because we're too damn lazy to drag enough people in for the study."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)