this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
1257 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

4625 readers
2075 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I feel like people are ignoring that Netflix was bleeding money during their "golden age". They only switched to being profitable a couple years back. A lot of times what people describe as enshittification is just unprofitable companies having to come up with an actual business model as venture capital dries up.

Also, merry Christmas:)

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can also argue that silicon valley has that particular business model of purposely making a product look great and cheap until enough people sign up.

It's distinct from how most companies run in the red at their inception in that those traditional businesses would gladly be in the black but are waiting for economies of scale or building a reputation among consumers.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

And that's probably why people get so disappointed w/ tech companies.

It's not that the prices they switch to are unreasonable, but that they hike prices after getting a user base, so it feels like a bait and switch instead of an early bird discount. If they made it an actual early bird discount, people would probably be fine with it.

Or maybe they keep prices the same, but drop content while keeping prices the same. If they instead structured it as a base tier and an "early bird" free access to a higher tier, which then starts costing money after some time period, I also think people would be okay with it. I have always thought Netflix should have packages, so you could opt-in to additional stuff like maybe Disney or HBO content. If Netflix did this early on, maybe Disney and HBO wouldn't have bothered making their own streaming platforms and instead just raked in revenue from these higher tier customers, because they get most of the benefit of having their own streaming platform, with none of the costs.

In pretty much every case, I'll point to Valve's business model as an example. Gaming companies generally don't feel the need to run their own platforms, and the ones that do often still distribute through other stores.

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Valve was the first, their business model was basically removing retail (the actual reason for Steam was to make updates trivial, so a Counterstrike update didn't break half the servers for 2 weeks), for everyone after Steam the business model was removing Steam by replacing it with a Steam clone.

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That package thing they do on prime video

Yeah, but Prime sucks in other ways. I wish I could combine what I like about Prime and Netflix into one service.

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Netflix has a market cap of 300bn. Public markets picked up right where venture capital left off no bother. The problem I think was the competitive forces as much as enshitified business model, though perhaps one cannot exist without the other. Certainly without doing their own content they could easily have become ludicrously profitable as a redistributer only, though I'm not convinced it would have stopped everyone and their dog moving in on the space.

Facebook is really the cleaner example of enshitification. They could have happily printed modest money for ever as the preeminent social network, but they took the greedy approach and morphed into a cesspool.

Merry Christmas to you!

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

If you take venture capital, you sacrifice your ability to not be greedy. Could Facebook have even existed without VC? Facebook didn't have ads during its startup IIRC, which meant they had no revenue.

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Theu saw the writing on the walls. They knew the big dogs would want a slice of the streaming game and they needed to pivot before the rug got pulled out from ubder them. Hulu was already being constructed when they were recalling shifting into making their own products IIRC. It wasn't just VC that got them to their golden era, they also relied on the industry bot taking streaming seriously enough and giving them deals that they never would today.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

This (though you need to fix your typos). Movie companies saw Netflix as a garbage rerun channel. They were chasing after opening weekends. It took a long time for them to finally launch their own service.