this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
218 points (98.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44171 readers
1825 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How about ANY FINITE SEQUENCE AT ALL?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

They also say "and reinterpret in base 10". I.e. interpret the base 2 number as a base 10 number (which could theoretically contain 2,3,4,etc). So 10 in that number represents decimal 10 and not binary 10

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

that number is no longer pi… this is like answering the question "does the number "3548" contain 35?" by answering "no, 6925 doesnthave 35. qed"

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t think the example given above is an apples-to-apples comparison though. This new example of “an infinite non-repeating string” is actually “an infinite non-repeating string of only 0s and 1s”. Of course it’s not going to contain a “2”, just like pi doesn’t contain a “Y”. Wouldn’t a more appropriate reframing of the original question to go with this new example be “would any finite string consisting of only 0s and 1s be present in it?”

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Then put 23456789 at the start. Doesn't contain 22 then but all digits in base 10.

[–] Phlimy@jlai.lu 4 points 19 hours ago

They just proved that "X is irrational and non-repeating digits -> can find any sequence in X", as the original question implied, is false. Maybe pi does in fact contain any sequence, but that wouldn't be because of its irrationality or the fact that it's non-repeating, it would be some other property