this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
781 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9883 readers
1313 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 46 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

Some people may be inclined to go up and over Central Park to get to the other side without paying the $9. That likely only affects uptown residents. I can’t imagine anyone driving around the park from midtown to avoid the fee.

The only legitimate concerns I’ve read are from contractors with tools and small businesses who deliver. They should be offered exceptions if walking or mass transit are unrealistic options. You’re not riding the subway with acetylene tanks or delivering fresh meat on Metro North. Other than that, I love it.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They should be offered exceptions if walking or mass transit are unrealistic options.

No they shouldn’t. That’s how you let rich people skirt the law.

Tradespeople should just treat it like any other business expense. Eat it or raise your rates a little bit.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

eat it

They never do

a little bit

It's never a little, and we all bitch about inflation.

There's never a simple solution.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

They sometimes do, at least temporarily. But yes on the whole I agree. I can almost guarantee that it’s a net benefit, that the time saved by traffic reduction makes up for the additional cost in congestion charges

[–] vulture_god@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The other concern I've heard, and has not been brought up in this thread yet, is the lobbying influence from rideshare companies to pass the congestion laws.

It's arguable that ride share vehicles are a better traffic density alternative to single rider personal vehicles, but there are pretty clear downsides to consider as well.

Source:

https://nypost.com/2025/01/04/us-news/uber-lyft-spent-millions-pushing-for-nyc-congestion-pricing-and-stand-to-make-killing/

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 30 points 15 hours ago

You can be self interested and still accidentally be on the right side of an issue. It doesn't spark joy, but I'm not going to throw the baby out with the bathwater on this. It's still a win, imo.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Construction firms make a ton of money in NYC, they can handle it, and I don't think I've ever seen someone delivering food from a car in the city, they all use bikes.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Commercial deliveries, not consumer. Every pizza joint needs flour, cheese, and tomatoes.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We'll see how it plays out. I could see less traffic meaning you can make more deliveries in a day, I figure one extra commercial delivery more than makes up for $10 extra.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly. It may disproportionately impact eateries with more diverse menus or foods with shorter shelf life. Time will tell.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Eh, it's NYC food is already super diverse. There's fairly established infrastructure for niche food products. If that truck needs a single restaurant to eat that $10, they were probably already paying an arm and a leg for that delivery.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The only legitimate concerns I’ve read are from contractors with tools and small businesses who deliver.

Maybe, but anecdotally the lighter traffic allows contractors to accomplish more jobs per day because they spend less time in traffic, which more than offsets the congestion charge.

Going from three hours per day in traffic down to even just two means there's an extra hour a contractor has available to make money each day.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

sure, but you can also deliver those with lighter vehicles that don't cause traffic. Congestion is congestion.

[–] lewdian69@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago

I'm confused. How will I deliver 15 pounds of Trump skirt Steaks if I can't drive my lifted Ram 3500 Heavy Duty with the high-output Cummins Turbo Diesel engine in downtown Manhattan?

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I've paid more just to go through the park lol

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)