this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
35 points (77.8% liked)

Shows and TV

917 readers
74 users here now

Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television

  1. Be nice
  2. Don't go off topic
  3. Don't rage farm

Other communities

We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
jet@hackertalks.com
BoozeOrWater@lemm.ee
MimicJar@lemm.ee
35
Is assisted dying a ‘clear and present danger’ to people with disabilities? New US film asks tough questions (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 days ago by FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/showsandmovies@lemm.ee
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We. Do. Not. Reapect. Their. Wishes.

Period.

I used the word conflict and you latched onto it. The one you should have paid intention to was the word "supercede".

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can throw semantic hissy fits as much as you want, that doesn't change the reality.

We also respect other's freedom of speech, unless it's libel. We respect your right to roam wherever, unless it's a restricted area.

And finally, the populations of many countries support e.g. abortions, but some countries restrict it anyway.

You seem not to understand the difference between public opinion and legislation.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck you.

You don't get to hide behind this and stay cordial. You don't get to excuse indifference and tolerance of forcefully overruling the deathwish of the suffering.

Your opinion means nothing. It's fleeting, performative and inconsequential. You're still accepting the restraints put upon the people who wish to die.

You personally are fine with people who restrain people who suffer and want to die to end it. You are fine with the enforcers of natural death being unyielding to the will of the restrained.

You don't really give a shit.

You're only temporarily acting like you're on the right side because we're currently having a conversation about it and the right and wrong of it is kind of obvious for the most part.

Public opinion overrules law if the public really cares. If it doesn't, it's not a democracy.

The public doesn't care to right this wrong. You don't care.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Puberty was hard for all of us, you'll pull through, I'm sure.

Afterwards you might understand that explaining a concept and advocating for it are not the same thing.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Condescending little shit.

I hope you choke on vomit when your time comes.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago

That's interesting. What makes you feel that way?

Seriously, though. Who exactly are you trying to convince like that?

Did that approach work anywhere before?