this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
52 points (90.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

58886 readers
532 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So i was installing a repack on my linux system, using bottles because of its flatpak sandbox.

As the install was wrapping, it asked the standard question about redirecting the websites, I (probably thinking nothing will happen) didn't uncheck anything, and to my surprise, it opened the Firefox browser on my main system and launched the website: giving me quite the spook

doesn't this mean that anything i install on bottles can somehow still ping home even if I disable networking from Flatseal?

am I being paranoid or is this a serious security flaw?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Check your flatpak permissions for starters.

Flatpak apps operate more like containers and not a full blown sandbox, unless that has changed recently.

This is an interesting blog post on the subject: https://hanako.codeberg.page/

Also, try flatpak run org.mozilla.firefox to see if you can launch a browser manually.

Disclaimer: It's been a bit since I have used flatpak, so take that into account. However, I do work in security by trade, so my quick notes may point you in a decent direction at a minimum.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

After a quick read over some parts of the article, and looking into the Bottles flatpak manifest, I don't think the sandbox escapes listed apply to Bottles - as long as you are exclusively using Wayland-compatible apps besides your games.

  • Bottles does not have access to $HOME, only through interactive xdg-portals
  • As long as you are using Wayland, an attacker can only access apps running through XWayland.

Sadly electron is still a pita, so closing Discord and VSCode while gaming would be necessary (or restrict their host access, which would break sharing files in Discord and many more things in VSCode).

So yes, I sadly have to agree, don't rely on a sandbox, unless your not running X11.

Luckily wine will soon support Wayland, so removing X11 access from Bottles would break this specific sandbox escape. Otherwise I do think flatpak/bubblewrap sandboxing is pretty solid.