this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
79 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

10206 readers
768 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
79
Barrie wanted to ban donations to homeless people on its property. Advocates are sending the plan to the UN (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A coalition of advocacy organizations is taking a previously proposed Barrie bylaw amendment to the United Nations as an example of a policy that criminalizes homelessness in Canada.

In May and June, the city north of Toronto proposed and then walked back two bylaw amendments that would have made it illegal for people and charitable groups to distribute food, literature, clothes, tents and tarps to unhoused people on public property.

The proposal was sent back to staff for review in June but was discussed again at a community safety committee meeting on Tuesday. A date for another council vote on the bylaw has yet to be set.

After Tuesday's meeting, the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition and Pivot Legal society sent the proposed bylaw amendments to the UN's rapporteurs on the right to adequate housing and extreme poverty. The intergovernmental agency has put out a call for laws impacting unhoused people for a report on decriminalizing homelessness, with a submission deadline of early October.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Instead of spending so much energy trying to 'get rid of' or remove the sight of poor people or the homeless ... which is what these regulations are trying to do.

Why not spend more energy trying to make a more equitable society so that you don't have as many poor people around.

It's economics ... either spend money now directly helping people so that they don't become poor or destitute.

Or spend lots of money later in policing, judicial, legal, political, social, medical and security services to try to deal with the poor and in trying to get rid of a problem that you created.

There has been many studies in the past that dealt with this issue ... it's cheaper to just directly help people now rather than in trying to hide the problem (which never works anyway)

[–] rocky1138@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I want to believe this is true and it certainly sounds reasonable. Do you have any links to the studies you're talking about?

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We need to transition out thinking from "personal responsibility", which essentially puts the blame on individual people as if we existed in a vacuum, to "how can we improve the system so that this is less likely to happen in the future?". This applies to all sorts of societal issues, from homelessness, to pedestrian/cyclist deaths, to obesity.