this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
140 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

8019 readers
522 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
140
Gould says she would chart a 'path' to a basic personal income (www.nationalobserver.com)
submitted 1 week ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The idea of a basic personal income in Canada gained traction after the pandemic when the government provided an emergency income benefit to millions of Canadians who lost their jobs because of COVID-19 restrictions.

NDP MP Leah Gazan introduced a private member's bill in 2021 to create a national framework for a universal basic income but the bill never made it beyond first reading.

A similar bill introduced in the Senate by Sen. Kim Pate was in the midst of being studied by a committee when Parliament was prorogued last month.

In 2021, the parliamentary budget officer published an analysis suggesting it would cost $85 billion to provide $17,000 to low-income Canadian families and would cut poverty rates in half.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like both.Gould and Carney. I think you're being unfair to the latter; look at his policies in more detail and I don't think he's to the right of Trudeau. Right of Gould, sure, but still nowhere near a conservative, especially the current iteration of that party.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/mark-carney-had-a-chance-to-weigh-in-one-of-the-defining-issues-facing-canada/article_8bb1815a-1149-11ef-a91a-43a3f346fa12.html ( archive)

MP Nate Erskine-Smith asked Carney what he would do about Canada’s growing wealth inequality. Carney’s answer was a bit unfocused, but he made two points clearly: 1) Let’s hope wealthy people give more to charity, and 2) We shouldn’t only focus on redistribution.

This is within the context of the greatest wealth inequality that has existed in Canada, ever. Mark Carney is not serious about fixing what ails Canada. As far as not being to the right of Trudeau, economically Trudeau also represents the neoliberal status quo that is not addressing our issues. Even if I grant that is true, it's not a point in his favour.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OK, sure, but he has good policies on housing and climate change, for example. Let's not fall into the trap of US voters who didn't vote for Harris because she didn't align with 100% of their preferences.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Carney's housing policies aren't offering anything that Gould isn't, except that Gould is promising to make non-market cooperative housing an important plank of her platform, where I happen to think that non-market solutions are the actual fix to most of Canada's current problems.

But really, I was never voting Liberal anyways on account of their position that the 'right' to strike is contingent on the approval of the sitting government.