this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
168 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
2543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 133 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The worst part is, they're partnering with Tencent.

Telegram is dead.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Telegram_in_Russia

"On 18 June 2020 Roskomnadzor lifted its ban on Telegram after it 'agrees to help with extremism investigations'."

That should be enough information. I'm on Signal, waiting for Matrix to perhaps stop sucking before I die of old age.

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Am also gonna stick with signal, eyeing up matrix. But what issues? The only reason i haven't tested it out yet is none of my friends seem too keen on trying it.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

For a lack of a better term: jank. Too much jank. For one instance, I have never seen in Whatsapp or Signal the phrase "unable to decrypt message". I can deal with that personally, but >90% of the people I need to communicate to with messengers will drop a service and never look back if they see that.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

I use it with many friends and it is super buggy. Calls work only ok on browser version of Element, bugs in encryption are common where you cannot read a message, Synapse server is bloating the database and not clean after itself, etc.

It's getting better month by month, but still can't recommend for your friends that are not technical people into open source. Better wait to not discourage them now.

[–] totallynotfbi@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This week, TON Foundation announced that it’s forged a partnership with Tencent Cloud, which has “already successfully supported TON validators and plans to expand its services further to help meet TON’s high compute intensity and network bandwidth needs.” Validators, in web3 lingo, are participants that help authenticate transactions in a blockchain network.

It looks like the partnership with Tencent only extends to their Web3 blockchain thing, and there doesn't seem to be any partnership in the main app so it's not the end of the world - at least, for now.

Also, what even is this TON blockchain? I never knew Telegram had anything to do with crypto :/

[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, nah. Anything the CCP can slip it’s slimy festering little dick into, it will.

There’s no way in hell that Telegram is secure.

[–] totallynotfbi@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess, but I don't see how much they can really influence Telegram without any stake in the app itself. They only seem to have a deal for cloud-hosting with the TON Foundation, a non-critical part of the app, and even that appears to be non-exclusive. So if Tencent tries to force a bad decision onto Telegram, what's stopping them from severing ties and moving everything over to another provider?

Of course, we don't know what the situation will be like in the future, but at this present moment, I don't think Telegram's security has been breached by this. (Also I think you triple-posted this comment)

[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Apologies for triple post. Lemmy seems a bit unresponsive so sometimes I hit ‘post’ a couple of times without realising that it actually registered.

[–] chi_chan@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

Telegram is partnering with tencent??

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

The entire point of E2EE is that it doesn't matter who the host is.

[–] neau@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We have chat standard called XMPP created by literially the same org that makes standards for Internet and Email.

And there are other public protocols to choose from.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately XMPP died roughly when the mobile devices became a mainstay. The way Google de facto took over the protocol didn't help either, but even without it XMPP isn't fit for the mobile-first world. The client needs to maintain an active connection at all times and there is nothing akin to push messaging, causing quite a significant battery drain. I might be unaware of some progress in this regard but this is how I remember it.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The client needs to maintain an active connection at all times" is just plain wrong. Offline messaging is what makes it so much more fit for the masses compared to IRC (I adore IRC btw).

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't mean offline messaging with messages waiting for the user to go online. I mean the lack of push messaging capabilities, so the user/client doesn't know there is a message waiting until they already go "fully" online.

[–] axo@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Signal for private conversations and for larger groups Matrix. Matrix can also be bridged to telegram effortlessly.