photonic_sorcerer

Makes sense, because I've never seen a SEM image like that... I thought it could've been an older model

The scale shows it being 20 microns in width, so it's still pretty big, relative to individual atoms. A micron is 10^-6 meters while the width of a hydrogen atom is about 10^-10 meters.

Parliamentary systems at least choose parties, not people. This means that the most popular party, not person, will have a greater share of power. It's harder, but not impossible (looking at you, Geert Wilders), to get a Trump.

Somehow? Perhaps because the state (or anyone, for that matter) shouldn't get to decide who lives or dies.

Username checks out

Did you mean Switzerland?

I'm going to assume a lab report is more accurate than its summary.

Y'all actually need to read the article before commenting:

One of the major initial concerns—the wastewater’s mercury content—stems from what experts believe may be egregious typos within SpaceX’s records. Lab reports indicate polluted waters contained 0.113 μg/L of mercury, while subsequent summaries appear to misplace the decimal point to show 113 μg/L. If the former measurement is accurate, then Starship’s wastewater contains roughly 1/17th the legal mercury limit.

SpaceX has done some shady shit regarding their environmental practices, but this claim about mercury just ain't it. Some of the comments further down go into more detail.

Care to give some context?

Fr, this one is great

I think running Biden gives Trump a better chance of winning. It's obvious Biden isnt fit for the job. I'd vote for a wet sandwich over Trump, but I'm not someone the Democrats have to convince. The Dems need a dramatically different candidate to have a fighting chance this November.

It could've been Sanders back in '16, maybe '20, but he's too old now. Don't switch one senile old fuck out with another.

I'd be very pleased with AOC, but she isn't too popular with a lot of people.