this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
972 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3618 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So from what I understand, theres 2 common ways that browsers combat this. Someone add to or correct me if I'm wrong.

  1. Browsers such as Mull combat this by looking the same as every other browser. If you all look the same, it's hard to tell you apart. I believe this is why people recommend using default window size when using Tor.

Ex: Everyone wearing black pants and hoodies with the facemasks. Extremely hard to tell who is who.

  1. Browsers such as Brave randomize metadata that fingerprinting collects so that it's more difficult to piece it all together and build a trend/profile on someone.

Ex: look like a dog in one place, a cat in another place. They get data for a dog but that doesn't help build anything if the rest of the data is a cat, hamster, whatever. No way to piece it together to be useful.

In both my examples, there are caveats. Just because everyone dressed the same doesn't mean someone isn't taller or shorter, or skinnier or fatter. There can still be tells to help narrow down. Or a cat that barks like a dog suddenly is more linkable to a dog if that makes sense lol.

In other words it still depends user behavior that can contribute to the effectiveness of these tools.

EDIT: got distracted. To answer your question I don't think so. I think it's more about user behavior blending in or being randomized. I think the only thing an extension would be able to do is possibly randomize the data but I'm unsure of such an extension yet. These aren't the only options, these are just ones I've read about recently. Online behavior, browswr window size, and I'm sure so much more also goes into it. But every little bit helps and is better than nothing.

EDIT2: Added examples for each for clarity.

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Mull is discontinued unfortunately, although I think it got forked?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fennec is similar and is maintained

There is a fork of mull too

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I went back to Fennec. We'll see if a fork survives long term.

I just want Firefox on F-Droid, and Fennec has been that for years. I only switched because I got a new phone and figured I'd try Mull.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

For mobile, yes, development stopped.

However, Mullvad (from the actual VPN folk) for desktop still exists.

https://mullvad.net/en/browser

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mullvad browser and Mull were not affiliated.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

That's why I said (from the actual vpn folk)

The two were often conflated because "mull" in the name. They also used many of the same resources for the prefs.js and other tweaks. (Arkenfox, tor uplift, etc)

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah maybe Tor Browser was the better example. Just trying to get the point out lol.

[–] yoshisaur@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Yep. It's fork is called ironfox

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The first point is flawed and even TOR doesn't execute javascript because it's impossible to catch everything when you give the server full code running capabilities.

The second point is more plausible but there's an incredible amount of work to do to fix this. Like, needing to rework browser engines from ground up and removing all of the legacy cruft. Brave is not capable of this and never will be no matter what they advertise because it doesn't have it's own engine.

That being said, these tools will get you quite far against commercial fingerprint products especially ones used for Ads but that will also ruin your browser experience as now you're just solving captchas everywhere 🫠

[–] JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Thanks for adding! Could you clarify a bit on the points so I can better understand where I was wrong at?