this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
138 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Rocket@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No one gets that wealthy without making some anti climate decisions.

I agree that consumers generally prefer to buy from people who make anti-climate decisions.

But it doesn't have to be that way. You can buy from those who make climate-friendly decisions instead. It will no doubt cost a lot more in the typical case as destroying the climate is a lot easier than not, but you can't have it both ways.

[โ€“] CaptainFlintlockFinn@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a lot of people it does have to be that way though. I just saw an article claiming 7 million Canadians are struggling to put food on the table. They canโ€™t really decide to take the more expensive climate friendly way. A billionaire could absolutely decide to do that though.