this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
157 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

No one gets that wealthy without making some anti climate decisions.

I agree that consumers generally prefer to buy from people who make anti-climate decisions.

But it doesn't have to be that way. You can buy from those who make climate-friendly decisions instead. It will no doubt cost a lot more in the typical case as destroying the climate is a lot easier than not, but you can't have it both ways.

[–] CaptainFlintlockFinn@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

For a lot of people it does have to be that way though. I just saw an article claiming 7 million Canadians are struggling to put food on the table. They can’t really decide to take the more expensive climate friendly way. A billionaire could absolutely decide to do that though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)