this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
35 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40183 readers
515 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
35
Is it possible to host a private, defederated, and completely isolated instance for use as your own social media platform? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by shinnoodles@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I want to set up a collaborative writing/socializing platform for my friend group using something like Calckey/Misskey, and just want to know if this is possible.

The non Fediverse options all look very lacking, and are meant for corporate/business environments anyway. It really feels like there's not many good and modern options for this sort of thing, but maybe there's better alternatives. Who knows, I'm really new to this scene.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No not really. If you run federation and block an instance then all you do is not consume their pushes through ActivityPub. They can still consume your pushes. But if you turn of federation then you disable the whole of ActivityPub and you don't push anything. Remember that ActivityPub is primarily push based, i.e. your instance pushes new posts out to all federated instances instead of pulling new posts in.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for that. I think I was getting confused between turning off all federation and defederating with an instance.

Setting all that aside, I would caution that even turning off federation isn’t enough to necessarily make it truly private. People could still discover it through random portscanning or whatever.

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah running solo you still need a hostname if anyone else is to reasonably use it, without resorting to vpns, private dns and/or other complexity.

And the default deployment of Lemmy is still publicly viewable without login so you're still posting everything for the world to see. Security by obscurity is no security at all. As has been said a million times. Same naturally goes for privacy.