this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
169 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38083 readers
469 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A slightly unusual video from the fantastic Technology Connections channel. It articulates a lot of my own thoughts on social media, "algorithms" and AI.

What surprised me the most was the statistic that only 3% of author's views come from the subscriptions feed. This is wild to me because subscriptions are pretty much the only way I have ever used YouTube.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I’m so glad this was algorithmically recommended. Thanks lemmings!

[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, algorithms are not bad at all if they are transparent. The "scaled" sorting in Lemmy is an algorithm and it does work great. You can take a look at the source code and see how it works. The problem here is not "algorithms" and we really shouldn't call it "algorithms" - it's tech companies force feeding you content they want you to see and preventing you from seeing the sites/posts/users you are actively following from reaching your feed. What Musk is doing on X is propaganda and we should call it that

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I’m here for a reason. It takes a lot of blocking/filtering too. But the reason I am here is my desire for “algorithmic complacency”. I like to spend some time mentally wandering.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Depending on how you browse, it was not algorithmically recommended. Even if you’re using “active” to filter, it’s barely an algorithm. Certainly not a personalized one, unless you’re just looking at the subscribed feed, in which case the personalization was done by you, not the formula.

That’s kind of the appeal of this kind of website, when there is automatic sorting it’s very straight forward and user mailable.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Person who invented sorting algorithms watching you sort by new "to avoid algorithms":

Disappointed coach gif

(yes, I'm also guilty of milking the ancient computer science vs. venture capital vocabulary joke; if you wanna start a flamewar better do it about "sorting" vs "ordering")