this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
209 points (99.5% liked)

politics

20671 readers
3498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When President Donald Trump announced last week he wanted Congress to “pass a clean, temporary government funding Bill,” that should have dropped the chances of a federal shutdown to near zero.

After all, shutdown threats tend to get driven by conservative hard-liners intent on cutting spending — and who better than Trump to pull them in line and keep the government open?

So it’s quite a testament to how dramatically Trump has shaken up Washington over the past six weeks that the likelihood of a shutdown hasn’t abated. In fact, according to my reporting, it might actually have increased.

This time, it’s Democrats who are itching for a fight — over the Department of Government Efficiency cuts that Trump has blessed and deputized mogul Elon Musk has gleefully carried out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

When DOGE infiltrated the Department of Education, several Democratic congresspeople, with media circus in tow, went to the DoE building but were stopped by a single skinny man, with no uniform, who produced no ID, and claimed to be security hired by Musk. A toddler could have pushed past him. Instead, they gave up and left.

Some Republicans have been having meetings with constituents. Why not crash the meetings? Ask hard questions. Make the republicans answer or show them running like cowards.

The left is desperate for new blood and new leadership. So, after the election, the DNC circled the wagons, and gave us... Hakeem Jeffries. Picking leadership that actually inspires people, instead of putting the same bland ghouls up on a pedestal, might actually get people to pay attention. Instead it feels like they have no plan other than to wait out the storm and turning to the same old playbook that's made them lose to Trump. Twice.

Last night, Al Green was the only representative that spoke out during the speech. The rest of the Democrats either stood silently, or held tiny signs like Wile E. Coyote in the most pathetic, childish, display of resistance I've ever seen. Imagine instead if there was a string of constant interruptions as they all walked out, one by one.

So yes, there is actually quite a lot they could do besides "raise awareness and hope voters do better in 2026." Saying there's nothing they can do is serving bullshit and claiming it's sirloin. Trump has signaled that the rules of law do not apply, so maybe start bending or breaking those rules? They have left it up to the people to protest. I haven't seen a single member of the DNC calling for action. Why should the left be motivated to protest if our leaders won't even acknowledge us, let alone stand with us?

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democratic congresspeople, with media circus in tow, went to the DoE building but were stopped by a single skinny man, with no uniform, who produced no ID, and claimed to be security hired by Musk. A toddler could have pushed past him. Instead, they gave up and left.

This seems like such an easy thing to get by. Get a random to walk up next to the other "guard" and say "yes we both got hired by Musk, but I just got word we can let you in."

Oh what do you mean that other guy isn't a real 'guard'? You both have the same credentials. Matter of fact the second guard could claim the first one got fired and to ignore them.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Right?

If you’re a US Congressperson, way to deal with some random security guard hired by Musk blocking you from entering the Department of Education is to tell them you’re a sitting US Congressperson, and that you’re entering that building, and if they accost you or your associates in any way, shape, or form, you’ll be bringing the full force of the law (as in, actual US code, not some dipshit hired by eel-on-musk) down on their head. And then you enter the building.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is actually probably the better way to do it. Be direct and use the power of your elected position. Big ask, apparently.

Honestly fairly irate at my rep and senators.

Guys. For real. I want to see you in the news, fucking shit up, shoving sticks into the bike wheel, throwing sand and metal filings in the gears, pouring sugar in the gas tank. Fucking DO SOMETHING. If you got arrested over an act of civil disobedience, or - god forbid - an actual, forceful use of the powers and privileges granted to you by virtue of your elected position, I would give you a standing fucking ovation. Just make a fucking attempt to have a goddamn pulse in the face of a fascist takeover. Ho-lee fuck. I did not realize that was such a big ask.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 2 points 23 hours ago

A knock on the noggin with an ornate walking stick would have been fine too.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 23 hours ago

For the department of education, weren’t there armed guards visible just inside the building? They still should have done something, but it was a bit more then one guy.