unions

1815 readers

3 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

jackalope@lemmy.ml

AFL-CIO: Ending Collective Bargaining at TSA Is a ‘Dangerous’ Move that Would Put Lives at Risk | AFL-CIO (aflcio.org)

submitted 2 days ago by whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml to c/unions@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Through a union, TSA officers are empowered to improve work conditions and make air travel safer for passengers. With this sweeping, illegal directive, the Trump administration is retaliating against unions for challenging its unlawful Department of Government Efficiency actions against America’s federal workers in court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is this the time for unions to rediscover that their rights aren't given to them via the law, but the threat of shutting down the operation? 50,000 TSA agents walk off the job. Scabs can't take over because they don't have security clearances, the FAA ground stops every airport that doesn't have TSA checks. (this would be done by the administrators below the Cabinet, cabinet member doesn't actually have the power to do anything, neither does Trump.)

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Shutdown works when you're actually doing anything productive. If TSA walks off everything would just run better lmao.

In all seriousness tho, yeah, organizing a FAA solidarity strike would be the way to go but Trump can just do the Reagan bit and say "go to work or get fired tomorrow". Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't.