this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
186 points (98.9% liked)

politics

21792 readers
4161 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The ousted head of human resources at the IRS, Traci DiMartini, is vowing to fight back after she says she was fired for telling IRS employees that agency firings came from the DOGE-controlled Office of Personnel Management.

DiMartini was placed on leave Monday for alleged “ineffective management” of the Trump administration’s mass federal employee purge, as well as “insubordination” toward the Department of Government Efficiency. She says she was fired not only for telling IRS staff where firings were coming from but also because she refused to call employees into the office over the weekend to onboard a DOGE staffer after they were putting in “60–70 hour” workweeks in the midst of tax season.

“They’re trying to politicize human capital,” DiMartini told Government Executive. “They want to be able to hire only loyalists, ignore Title 5 [of the U.S. Code] and commit flagrant prohibited personnel practices. When you look at the Merit Systems Protections Board and what the civil protections are, we’re supposed to have a nonpartisan civil service, and we have been completely whipsawed.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

DOGE only looks incompetent if you're so naive to believe that its goals are what it claims them to be.

If you understand that its actual goals are to sow chaos and destroy the effectiveness of the government, inflicting "trauma" on long-time civil servants while installing MAGA sycophants and acting quickly to "flood the zone" to circumvent the courts trying to sanction it, it's doing a pretty expert job.

Stop. Underestimating. The. Enemy.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they both really can't.

Why do you want people to not take the threat seriously?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're attempting to speed run a power grab and shrinking the government at the same time. Obviously, this is what Putin wants but what do the rest gain by destroying a system they benefited from? Do you see how silly that is? A monarchy would never do that so dumb.

[–] foxlore@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Look at the news. They're not just shrinking what they can control. They're gutting infrastructure. They're literately shrinking anything remotely federal.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many federal cops have they fired?

Soldiers?

Just a smattering of leadership?

They don't care about the environment. They definitely don't care about union representation. They don't care about food safety, or any other kind of safety.

They care about power and money they can loot.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago

All I'm arguing is both can be true. That's it. Sorry for trying to add a little nuance.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They’re attempting to speed run a power grab and shrinking the government at the same time.

"Shrinking" is buying into their dishonest framing of the situation. Don't do that. What they're doing is purging, not "shrinking."

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

FFS, I'm only human. I can't make all of you damn happy.