this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1214 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66584 readers
5289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
1214
OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 days ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
493 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe that the protection copyright provides is proportionate to how much you can spend on lawyers. So, no protection for the smallest creators, and little protection for smaller creators against larger corporations.

I support extreme copyright reform, though I doubt it should be completely removed.

[–] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, my point is not removing it or reducing it to 5 years.

I'm not saying copyright is doing its job particularly well right now, but reducing its protection is not helping creators.

Copyright IS about protecting creators; we're just still letting corporations run the show.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Copyright IS about protecting creators

No, it isn't. The intent WAS to "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts". The reality IS that it harms society, by benefiting only the already powerful.

[–] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

If that were true, removing copyright entirely would benefit society.

Just because it's been corrupted doesn't mean the intent and purpose isn't still there.

It's absurd that we essentially agree on what needs to happen, but you're stuck on the idea copyright currently has no benefit to anyone but big business.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

removing copyright entirely would benefit society

I could be convinced of that.

I think extreme reform would be of more benefit. Copyright as-is is an active harm.

[–] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

You seem very convinced, considering the downvotes of discussion.