bss03

If you win with the kid that killed both his parents in your party you get: BAD END

A decades long double blind controlled study is FAR beyond the GRAS standard that requiring it would stifle not only commerce but also science in general.

That's why sometimes we don't see bad effects in food until decades later.

My body is a MACHINE that turns DIRTY things into CLEAN things. /skeleton-deadlift-meme

I am.

(j/k; I'm pretty poor at cleaning things.)

While I do have some control over my DNS and can create arbitrary TXT entries, I can't to that in an automated way easily. I'm using Gandi.net to host my DNS rather than running my own DNS sever(s).

EDIT: Gandi is listed https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/dns-providers-who-easily-integrate-with-lets-encrypt-dns-validation/86438 so maybe I can automate a DNS-01 challenge without too much issue, I just have to switch away from certbot to one of the other tools.

It does have access to the HTTP root directories. But, it still can't open port 80/443 when apache already has that port open.

EDIT: I guess my certbot renew just needs to be reconfigured to use a --webroot, so it doesn't try to listen on it's own.

Probably the comment has federated to lemmy.world, but the deletion of the comment hasn't yet.

Looks like autoincorrect did a s/CRLs/Carla/ for you.

Technically my renews aren't automated. I have a nightly cronjob that should renew certificates and restart services, but when the certificates need renewal, it always fails because it wants to open a port I'm already using in order to answer the challenge.

I hear there's an apache module / configuration I can use, but I never got around to setting it up. So, when the cron job fails, I get an email and go run a script that stops apache, renews certs, and restarts services (including apache). I will be a bit annoying to have to do that more often, but maybe it'll help motivate me to configure apache (or whatever) correctly.

Debian Stable

Obv: I'd pound my wood(en stake) into her!

Success, but barely. You've avoided being petrified, but really pissed her off. 😊

Honestly, I don't even like using the word "cheat" to describe customizing a single-player gaming experience in a way not blessed by the developers. Terrafirmacraft (and maybe even just Gregtech) isn't cheating at Minecraft; certainly the experience isn't "easier".

So, yes, I will play the game is whatever way makes for the most fun for me, whether that's "cheating" or not to you.

For experiences that aren't single-player, including (e.g.) anything with a global leaderboard (even at third-party one), I can understand why someone might choose to cheat, but I think I could deny myself those temptations. But, I've never been a "simple" cheat away from the top of a leaderboard or any other sort of acclaim or reward.