In case anyone is wondering, it's rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is "a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.", which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

rqd2.net rule 3:

Nothing illegal under US (specifically Nevada) or local law. You know what that includes. (In case you don’t know what that includes, I mean child pornography [anything that fails the Dost Test], sexually interacting with minors, etc.) We have a zero tolerance policy for anything that fails the Dost test. Anything violating it will result in an immediate ban and removal of images. No admitting to anything that could cause the server to go under investigation, such as looking at child porn.

Unfortunately I have been shown that there is promotion of pedophilia on that site. Although there may not be actually illegal content.

https://rqd2.net/c/map

[–] 520@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just because they aren't directly hosting illegal content, doesn't make it danger free. They freely encourage 'pro contact' as if it isn't a very strong possibility that, when someone is in contact with a person they're attracted to, they may well ... take the next step.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, that's what pro contact means. Pro sexual contact. They don't think there's any inherent problem with sexual relationships between adults and kids.

"Pro contact" is just a polite way to say it, obfuscating what they're really talking about.

[–] 520@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To them it seems that pro contact means contact with the person you're attracted to, even if it's not (edit: explicitly) sexual yet. Kinda like how you might talk with someone you're crushing on but not yet banging.

There already is a perfectly acceptable word for this though. It's called 'grooming'. It is called so because it is a precursor to what will inevitably become what they themselves call 'abuse'.

You know how when you've been talking to someone you really want for months and the sexual tension has been ratcheting up higher every minute, then something just makes that explode and suddenly you're just not thinking, just doing? How the everloving fuck do they expect pro contact to end anything other than in an immeasurably fucked up and scarring version of what I just described?

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think you may be using a different definition of terms. Pro-contact MAPs think that having sex with minors is fine, and that it isn't abuse. Here's a link to the MAP wiki on the subject: https://map-wiki.com/index.php/Pro-contact

If you go to the instance being discussed, you'll see people openly saying that sex with kids is okay and that they don't think there's a problem with it.

[–] 520@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh...oh...excuse me, I'm feeling sick 🤢 like, I knew these guys were crossing serious lines but to think it is 100% fully intentional with no ignorance to the dangers involved...fucking 🤮

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yes I see that now.

load more comments (2 replies)