this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
1037 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

73035 readers
2583 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

it's amazing that they think people are going to continue to pay them at these prices for no content

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Some people seem to believe the customers are suckers who will eternally take the price hikes, but even the most gullible fool still doesn't have infinite money. At some point they'll have to cut something or the bank will cut it for them.

Well, back to the seas it seems. It was fun while it lasted. One might as well pay for a VPN instead.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The customers are suckers who will take a lot. Look up skylink satellite tv provider, and their "always free" tier that's currently 6,90€ a month.

They gave it for free just around the time analog tv was being decomissioned. And after they've captured the large userbase, who couldn't switch back, they pulled the trigger.

[–] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm sure they did the math they've calculated that the increases will offset the loss is subscribers. From the article it looked like the royalties will increase so less subscribers paying more is even more profitable.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It wouldn't be the first time companies precisely calculate next quarter earnings and fail to account for the long term survival of their business.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly I'm beginning to think it's a myth that they "did the math" with how many have made bad decisions.

[–] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Their last price hike they lost 3-5% of their subscribers, the 30% price hike made up for it.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you go with Mullvad (which is one of the best private VPN providers) you even save some money, as it's just 5 EUR/month. You can also take the 20 bucks that you would have given to Netflix and pay a seedbox company like RapidSeedbox to torrent anonymously.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Every time Netflix changes anything, people freak out and say they're gonna lose all their subscribers.

And every time, Netflix makes more money than before, because they have awesome data analysis and have a very good idea of how many subscribers will leave and how much more money they'll make from the remainder.

I remember when they lost like 4% of their subscribers a few years back and everyone was all doom and gloom, but they'd raised their rates like 15%

[–] moody@lemmings.world 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Eventually they'll figure if they can get one person to pay 10 billion dollars a month, they can lose all their other subscribers and still hit their quarterly goals.

[–] gulasch_hanuta@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, Elon might be dumb enough.

[–] Goo_bubbs@lemmings.world 2 points 2 years ago

Until the shareholders demand more.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's essentially what the Twitter board did.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly. No one I know cancelled. They just had to buy separate accounts while complaining.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I'm the only person I know who cancelled. Like you said everyone else just complains about it.

[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Yeah, this is exactly like the Reddit and Twitter situation. No matter how bad it gets, people don’t care. If they’re used to something, they’ll rather put up with the new bad stuff than changing their habits.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I keep hearing people say this no content thing. Meanwhile I just went through Castlevania, one piece, sweet tooth and Kingdom this past week and there's like 30 shows and movies on my cue