this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
304 points (97.2% liked)

News

28345 readers
5147 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The hypothetical is "ZOMG thousands of people are being prevented from voting over this!"

No, they aren't. There's no evidence that thousands of people are so disengaged from society that they don't have legal ID, all the things they need legal ID for, and yet somehow still want to vote.

There's ANECDOTAL evidence, one person here, another person there, a 98 year old lady who really wants to vote but gosh darn it her birth certificate burned up in a fire in 1946, but no evidence there is mass disenfranchisement.

The numbers claiming "millions" are based on statistics, not actual reality, and when you have to have basic ID to get a job, have a bank account, rent a place, etc. etc. etc. I do not buy the "millions" number and I do not buy that they are that detached from society and still have a desire to vote.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

who cares if it's as low as 50 people? if they have the right to vote, imposing a new requirement for no good reason which prevents even just 50 people from voting is a violation of their rights.

there's no need for it. it suppresses likely democratic voters while republicans are the ones who always push for this voter ID garbage. and you, apparently.

it's blatant intentional voter suppression.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It isn't voter suppression. Again, look at a blue state that tied voter registration to state ID:

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/12/26/oregon-voter-turnout-dropped-75-percent-2024-election/

"Since 2012, the last election before the new system, the percentage of eligible Oregonians registered to vote has increased from 75% to 94%."

Registrations are up.

Look at the election turnout in Oregon compared to national turnout since enabling motor voting in 2016:

2016 - 80.33% vs. 59.2%
2018 - 67.8% vs. 53.4%
2020 - 78.5% vs. 65.3%
2022 - 66.9% vs. 46.8%
2024 - 75% vs. 63.4%

Turnout is up. Nobody is being disenfrachised here, more people are registered, more people are participating. All of that TERRIFIES Republicans.

Sources:

https://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Documents/Voter_Turnout_History_General_Election.pdf

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/voter-turnout-in-presidential-elections

https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/04/behind-2018-united-states-midterm-election-turnout.html

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2022:_Analysis_of_voter_turnout

[–] pohart@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I've known people that worked under the table for cash. People that sublet apartments or that rented a room from someone with an extra. These people don't need IDs to function. I'm guessing they had ids but not all of them drove, so I don't even know.