this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
513 points (99.2% liked)

politics

22575 readers
4184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

With a smidge of Saudi Arabia thrown in.

[–] forallmoonkind@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Dash of Maos's cultural revolution

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. I just read a bunch of teenage dumbasses are going to rewrite 60 million lines of Cobol code in "months". So definitely more than a smidge: telling some in the younger generation that they are magical beings that just understand everything better than anyone that came before stinks to high heaven of cultural revolution trash.

I wonder what their little red book will be? The Shart of the Deal?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The way you describe it, it sounds more like Dianetics.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's all part of the same massive con.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's a bunch of independent cons but they all use the same methods.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I have serious doubts about that kind of timeline, most especially for such a critical system (I write software for a living; no way in hell would I give a timeline of "months" for something like this, but then I have years and years of experience, while Dunning-Kruger is running rampant in our government right now - giving teenagers the keys to the kingdom and constantly praising them for what prodigies they are is going to not end well).

But since our version of Idiocracy includes such Hollywood tropes like "young people just know tech", we are all consigned to this....I'm sure the average magoff is going to proclaim what a "genius" fElon and his techbois are all during the process, too.

Given fElon's many failed delivery timelines on things related to his companies, I expect more of the same here. Sadly, he's going to ruin a lot of people's lives in the process...at least with his bullshit companies, no one has to opt in to that. In this case, he's broken into our government and he's going to impact millions who want no part in his bullshit or his stupid crew of teenage dumbasses. And I bet anything they try to use "AI" to do most of this work.

According to an article in Wired, Elon Musk has appointed a team of technologists from DOGE to "rewrite the code that runs the SSA in months." This codebase has over 60 million lines of COBOL and handles record keeping for all American workers and payments for all Social Security recipients. Given that the code has to track the byzantine regulations dealing with Social Security, it's no wonder that the codebase is this large. What is in question though is whether a small team can rewrite this code "in months." After all, what could possibly go wrong?

https://developers.slashdot.org/story/25/03/28/2148205/doge-to-rewrite-ssa-codebase-in-months

New Slogan be like: ~~没有共产党~~ If it weren't for MAGA, ~~没有新中国~~ There would be no New America

(The crossed out phrase is a common propaganda thing that was taught in mao era China meaning: "If it weren't for the CCP, there would not be a 'New China'... which is BS lol".)