this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1061 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1656 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wiping out the Republicans? I don't see a downside with that.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The path to get there would be a pretty big downside. Some of us would say worth it, but that’s a privileged position and likely one we’d regret. Big time rock and a hard place energy.

[–] RedPostItNote@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOP should have been banned from American politics already.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We’re never should have fallen to two parties like Washington and other founders warned against.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Washington warned against political parities, period. The problems of first past the post creating a two party duopoly weren't understood at the time.

It's not a very practical approach to nationwide electoral strategy, IMO. Washington himself was allied with Hamilton's Federalist party in practice, even if he never officially declared for it.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

We've always had two major parties from the very beginning. But Washington was right. Perhaps the way things were set up was the problem. If only we had ways to change how the government worked and the rules weren't set in stone.

/s, because that's also what some of the Founders wanted to see happen. If anything that's what fell, the adaptability of the system to changing times.

[–] Grindl@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Two parties is a design flaw of first past the post. There can be regional parties, and occasionally re-alignment elections, but the natural outcome of single member first past the post elections is two big-tent parties with roughly 50% of the seats each.

You need proportional representation or multi-member districts to have more than two stable parties.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It will happen with the current administration. Red states are the most reliant on government "handouts". Conservative voters are predominantly the least educated, least informed, and most economcially vulnerable people. They will be the most affected by trumps tariffs. They will be the most affected by his billionaire tax breaks. They will be the most affected by his cuts to social programs. I hate to see my fellow Americans fall on hard times, but despite all the history, expert opinions, and direct evidence that Trump is going to fuck them over, they keep voting for him. It's going to be hard, but I'm not giving my conservative neighbors and family any direct support for the next 4 years. Thoughts and "prayers" are all that they will get from me. Let them suckle from the shriveled teat of their spray-tanned steer this time.