this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
230 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38472 readers
304 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Your smart TV is (presumably) on your local network, so you should be routing the requests locally (point the client at the local ip, assuming it didn't autodiscover it) not through the VPN/ tunnel.
often, but not always. sometimes the TV is at a different house, when you are a guest or at a second property
Or even just on a differently vlan that you want to go through your reverse-proxy because that is where your security features are to separate you from shit you don't trust.
In which case there are still ways to make it work, like putting in an SSO bypass rule for the IP of your other property. Point is, under no circumstances is it impossible to both have it be protected against scanning attacks like the ones described in the gh issue, and keep it available to use over the internet for authorized users.