this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
310 points (94.8% liked)
PC Gaming
10782 readers
887 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Of course they did. All of these companies are against anything that challenges them.
Challenging them is one thing. Disrupting the CEO's public speech is another. I think almost every company would fire any employee who did that for any reason.
I think we all need to remember that no CEO’s speech is more important that stopping human rights violations. Imagine if we had to wait until Hitler was done speaking to do anything
I guess very few PR departments would agree with you
Seriously who cares about what a PR department thinks. Their job is literally to lie and manipulate people.
It's not about caring. It's about what gets done
It's about psychological manipulation. PR is really just propaganda renamed and repackaged. I don't believe they should be able to practice what they do at all.
If their craft was allowed they should be held to a high standard with a stringent set of ethics backed up by laws.