this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
652 points (94.5% liked)

politics

23071 readers
3411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It passed the house a few days ago, from my understanding it is less likely to pass the Senate

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't it? GOP are 53 seats in the senate, this is their bill with unanimous support in the house.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still needs 60 votes to pass the fillabuster.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, good point, this time it isn't a budget so Fillibuster Time it is.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I wonder what the excuse will be for not filibustering this time. I wonder how quickly democrats will cave. I wonder how many will.

What I don't wonder is what the talking point will be to defend the most unsurprising betrayal of principles in history. It's gonna be the same as in this thread. "Ignore the turncoats, look at how many republicans they voted with! Vote blue no matter what we do."

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this is likely to pass its not just the Republicans who are compromised.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Even if every Democrat in the house that day voted Nay it still would have passed by 3 votes

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would anyone vote for this that isnt a bigot? The fact any did is vomit inducing. Its authoritarian trash through and through.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The fact that any did is vomit inducing, although I've never personally vomited out of stress, but this bill exists because of Republicans. It passed the vote because of Republicans. This is a Republican bill and we need to make sure people don't try to spin this as some DNC failure when electing more DNC is the exact solution to this problem.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk, the DNC's lessons from this seemed to be "move more rightward"

Thats why AOC is rolling with an independent right now.

Unless she gets real power in the party I dont care for them anymore. They dont want to harbor progressives.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The current DNC are more left than they've ever been, which has been more true every election.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats not even remotely true. The powers that be are all neoliberal. Otherwise AOC would be on the road with establishment Democrats and Bernie Sanders wouldn't be Independent.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You say they support human rights like it's a bad thing.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I say they support their donors. Not really human rights. Otherwise we wouldnt have 80% of them spouting Israeli bullshit.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

The two parties are both supporting Israel in the conflict, but only one of them supports a single state solution.