Unpopular Opinion

7130 readers

447 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

admiralpatrick@lemmy.world

302

Game price isn't the problem, wages are (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by overload@sopuli.xyz to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Game prices for the past 30 years haven't kept pace with inflation.

I recognise the argument that publishers are shifting larger volumes of units now, which has been a factor that has allowed the industry to keep price increases below inflation for the last 30 years.

Wages not being even close to keeping up with inflation (especially housing inflation) is the real issue here, not the $70/$80 video game.

You should be angry at your reduced purchasing power in all of society, not just with the price of Nintendo games.

(Secondary less unpopular opinion, the best games out these days are multiplatform and released at least 5 years ago, buy them for << $80 and wait for sale the new releases, when they too are 5 years old)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Wutchilli@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jup, have had that thought before. And i think another Factor is that people now own more games than back then. Making their collection more expensive and equal to that what a few games cost in the past.

So we Always sortoff spend the same part of our budget for games, and only now when the price is rising it takes more out of our budget.

So we feel like the price is rising in an unfair manner .

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

The average quality of games has both gone up in terms of graphics and smooth gameplay but down on being interesting and innovative. I'd say this is also kind of part of the issue.

Baldur's Gate 3 in my opinion was allowed to cost more than 60 euros just because it was so well made and was innovative for the genre.

Mario Kart 9 Open World though? It's literally just mario kart again but with a kinda useless open world, why should that cost 80 euros?