this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
175 points (88.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9628 readers
677 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Car Savior Complex (noun)

Pronunciation: [kahr seyv-yer kuhm-pleks]

Definition: The Car Savior Complex refers to a mindset in which individuals exclusively prioritize automobiles as the sole solution for mobility challenges faced by people with disabilities, dismissing alternative modes of transportation. Rooted in a lack of awareness and understanding of diverse disability experiences, this complex manifests when there is an insistence that cars are the only viable means of transportation for all individuals with disabilities, irrespective of their unique needs and abilities.

Characteristics:

  1. Exclusivity: Belief that cars are the only legitimate and practical mobility solution for people with disabilities, disregarding the varied requirements and preferences of individuals within the disabled community.
  2. Limited Accessibility Consideration: Ignoring the accessibility barriers faced by individuals who may find it challenging to enter, exit, or operate traditional vehicles due to their disability.
  3. Neglect of Public Transportation: Dismissing the potential benefits of accessible public transportation, shared mobility services, or active transportation methods, which can offer viable options for many people with disabilities.
  4. Overlooking Environmental Impact: Disregarding the environmental consequences of overreliance on cars, such as pollution and congestion, in favor of prioritizing personal vehicles as the default choice for all disabled individuals.
  5. Ignoring Socioeconomic Factors: Failing to acknowledge economic constraints that may prevent some individuals with disabilities from owning or maintaining a private vehicle, limiting their mobility options.

Criticism: The Car Savior Complex is criticized for perpetuating a one-size-fits-all approach to mobility solutions, which fails to account for the diverse needs, abilities, and preferences of people with disabilities. This narrow perspective hampers the development of inclusive transportation policies and infrastructure, hindering progress toward accessible and equitable mobility for all.

Usage: The term "Car Savior Complex" is utilized in discussions related to urban planning, disability rights, and transportation advocacy to challenge the assumption that cars should be the exclusive focus of efforts to enhance mobility for people with disabilities.

Example Sentence: "The city's insistence on promoting a car-centric infrastructure reveals a Car Savior Complex, neglecting the needs of disabled residents who could benefit from a more inclusive approach, incorporating accessible public transportation and pedestrian-friendly pathways."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments