this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
203 points (96.8% liked)

Selfhosted

46677 readers
495 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was just thinking "bah ssd, that'll be expensive" but a quick search on Amazon suggests prices have dropped quite a bit.

12Gb soldered on memory though. That's a shame.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

That's quite the RAM for a NAS, no? I think mine has 512MB.

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

With a SOC like that, that no way will only serve as a NAS, i can see my self easily hosting a dozen container on it and a couple VMs. That said, 12Gb is quite sufficient for my need.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Sure, but then you're looking not for a NAS but more for a minilab right? Personally I just split it in 2, one ol' trustworthy NAS and then some thinkcentre tiny to mess with.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Using a machine like this just as a NAS is a bit of waste. It's a full blown PC that would work very nicely as a home server for Jellyfin etc. The RAM will limit the utility, though.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on your usecase. This could very well be more than just a NAS.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well yes but it is a NAS not a homelab right?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Again, not necessarily. I have something very similar I use as a server.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For those zettabyte SSDs 😁 ?

I don't know what it is except the acronym, why whould someone use ZFS?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

ZFS is powerful for reliability and data protection. It is designed to hold lots of data and to tolerate hardware failures. One key aspect of ZFS is that it caches data in ram for reads so having lots of ram speeds up read performance.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You are probably right, mine is from 2013 😰

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was recently told that 16GB wasn't much for ZFS...

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe it isn't bad if you have good SSDs

Yeah, my NAS uses 3GB out of my 16GB total. I don't think I've ever seen it use more than 5GB.