this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
175 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23071 readers
4190 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, this is not incompetence, it is insider trading. They had a plan with tariffs and made their money. When Trump finally falls the people that raised up that useful idiot will all get to keep the insider trading money they made by yo-yo'ing the economy.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The issue the OC is talking about isn't something you can just walk back and take your winnings. Owning the husk of a once great economy isn't really a great outcome.

I don't think anyone understands that if he ousts Powell/gets his interest rate lowered, we're looking at a depression or worse. That kind of economic crisis has the potential to ruin literally anyone, including the wealthy/elites.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone understands that if he ousts Powell/gets his interest rate lowered, we're looking at a depression or worse.

Um, I think everyone except his hardcore followers understands that.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If that were the case he wouldn't be in power anymore. Either enough people don't understand or don't believe it.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

The Republicans who could and should hold him to account (senators, representatives, and Supreme Court justices) are too afraid of his rabid base to do anything. If they oppose him, Trump will start raging on truth social that they are communist America haters that need to be “dealt with”. Stochastic terrorism is a real thing, and these people are cowards.

The oligarchs that put him in power thought they were smart enough to control him. I think they are just now realizing that they can’t, and they are freaking out.

[–] friendlyghost@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

Ai think the problem is now that he’s non hardcore supporters are still thinking this is some kind of art of the deal fuckery. That at some point he’s going to get the best deal in the history of deals , maybe ever

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Many cowards in the Republiqan Party. Also a whole lotta stupid people more engaged in their stupid identity politics who have the mantra of "any criticism of donvict is because someone just has 'trump derangement syndrome' and something something argle bargle DEI".

[–] figjam@midwest.social 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Calling it now. It will be called the DEI-pression

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

He will say that he had to "walk back" his tariffs and the "libs" wouldn't let him make the deals he needed. His idiot followers will believe him.