this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
315 points (96.7% liked)

News

36618 readers
3097 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Live Stream Sources

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBejfVOUmBs

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTjr7VvL9/

Titled "An Urgent Conversation with the American People," the livestreamed discussion comes ahead of Congress' return to session on Monday.

A statement released by both officials' offices said in part, "Republican leaders have made clear their intention to use the coming weeks to advance a reckless budget scheme to President Trump's desk that seeks to gut Medicaid, food assistance and basic needs programs that help people, all to give tax breaks to billionaires. Given what's at stake, these could be some of the most consequential weeks for seniors, kids and families in generations."

According to the statement, Rep. Jeffries and Sen. Booker plan to speak to shared American values and the nation's religious and moral underpinnings, and how the budget bill opposes these beliefs. They also plan to affirm to Americans watching the livestream that their voices matter, especially in this moment in time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What are you even saying here? When did I use whataboutism? When did I compare myself to the Nazi party?

I am left of the Democratic Party on every issue. So if you're saying I'm not left but the Democrats are, how does that square?

As a side note, it's lovely when you start using your little subtle variations on names as a derogatory term. You know how petty and stupid it is when the Republicans say "Democrat Party" as some weird dig to emphasize the "rat" ending? Same energy with you and "leftist" which is a term I never used for myself and which is often used by Democrats derogatorily. I describe myself as left speaking of the left-right spectrum. If you want a political label for me call me a progressive, though even that isn't the whole truth.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

When did I use whataboutism?

When you used republicans being Nazis as an example to illustrate some dumb point about democrats calling themselves the left- despite the fact that they’ve been called the left since they’ve existed.

When did I compare myself to the Nazi party?

When did I say you did?

I am left of the Democratic Party on every issue

Cool. But if you’re disassociating with democrats, maybe think about picking a new name. Because when I- and I’m certain many others, hear “the left”, we appropriately think democrat/liberal, and not progressivist, socialist, tankie, or communist- as many in these groups liken themselves as.

So if you're saying I'm not left but the Democrats are

Yes. That is what I am saying. If you’re not a liberal/democrat, you’re not “the left” by commonly accepted definition.

As for the remaining rhetoric, it is funny how I use my subtle variations on names, isn’t it?

I mean… We all see how kindly the lemmy “progressives” treat everyone here that is perceived to be even remotely right of Stalin.

Maybe when you are seen standing up to your fellow progressives when they use terms like “libtard” and “bluemaga” and shouting them down like think you’re doing here, you can finally earn that high road you seem to feel you are owned. Until then, enjoy living it up in the slums like the rest of us.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's not whataboutism. Whataboutism is using issue B to distract from issue A. I'm using another flavor of issue A that you might understand to illustrate issue A.

You said "leftists" (meaning me, derogatorily) strangely compare themselves to the Nazi party.

Let me say this again for the little on the back: you don't define the left, the Democrats don't define the left, you and the Democrats aren't even left. I don't care about the origin of the term in 1800s France, that's completely irrelevant today. France is 5 governments away from that time.

I'm not a fan of Stalin or communism. So get the fuck out with your red scare bullshit. You're the one who went on the attack here, so get your own self and house in order before you start telling others how they need to behave.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You said "leftists" (meaning me, derogatorily) strangely compare themselves to the Nazi party.

I said nothing even remotely close to this. In fact- YOU brought up Nazis, not me. I was simply saying that “the left” in America- by definition are democrats and liberals, and I proved it.

And:

So get the fuck out with your red scare bullshit

Really? Red scare bullshit? Dude, what’s with the persecution complex?? I haven’t said shit about you, and here you are playing victim- twice over, to some imaginary accusations I’ve made. Fo ahead and re-read through this discussion and point out to me exactly where I ever made an assumption of you- and while you’re at it- note how quick you are with the presumptive accusations. Or wait….

was this not you?

you and the Democrats aren't even left

Looks like a direct accusation to me! Weird how you’re the one protesting. It makes methinks something or another….

Seriously though… maybe think about taking a step back and chilling out a bit.

I haven’t once said a single thing about you personally. I don’t know you. And from this conversation alone, I honesty don’t care to.

And whether or not it was or wasn’t whataboutism is entirely irrelevant to the point that the whole Nazi bit was a shit argument to begin with. So, how about you tell me what logical fallacy it was and then we can hang that sign on it instead?

Would that make you feel better?

Walk it off.