764
Trump Signs Executive Orders to Militarize Police, Punish Sanctuary Cities and Refugees
(www.democracynow.org)
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
764 points (98.7% liked)
News
36354 readers
3892 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Am Not an American . Are the Democrats now doing something to be more appealing in the future, or they just rely on Trump to keep being awful?
At the moment, our fiercest Democrat just voted for the new law to allow The government to censor anything on the internet they don't like. I think it's fair to say it's not going well.
I think now is a good time for third party too get going. I'm sure a bunch of left leaning Democrats could take a good chunk of the vote and tea party the Democrats.
We've passed a line, sans drastic things happening, there won't be any meaningful votes anymore.
Political IQ Exam: Do you think voting for a third party candidate is a viable option in a First Past the Post system"
The answer to that question is the simplest way possible to identify a complete lack of political intellect.
Wow you're really committed to that user name .
And people expected Kamala to be different why?
You have to admit, we wouldn't be in a useless trade war threatening to tank the economy right now. Or threatening to anex Canada or Greenland. And they wouldn't have just voted to make it legal to deport US citizens.
Funny, why don't you name the law and let people look it up and read what it actually says? Are you talking about S.146, a bill to prohibit the nonconsensual online publication of intimate visual depictions of individuals, and requiring platforms to remove it upon request?
So in other words, if someone posts nudes of you online and you object to it, this law would require the site to take it down upon your requesting it.. is THAT the censorship you are crying about??
You mean the one that's so vaguely worded that it can be used by the government to silence anything and remove free speech?
Why didn't you publish the entire full text of the bill here and all the possible outcomes along with a bunch of news articles listing pros and cons of such thing?
Christ, if you think that's crying please don't ever have kids.
The Democrats are probably praying that Trump lives till he's 1000 years old, otherwise they would need to do something more than not being Ttump
The only thing not being Trump has gotten them so far was one more term of an old white guy who was barely left of the right.
I think this is hard for people from other countries to understand. Our Democrats are not an opposition party. We don't have that concept in our system. I'll admit I was naive to it before Trump started Trumping. Even after the first Trump I was thinking, "Well, that was fucking dumb. Glad we found our sanity again." And I was wrong.
I wouldn't have been able to articulate this before. I credit my time on Lemmy for some of it. But in reality you can't explain any of this shit show UNLESS you accept that our entire political system is now structured to serve the rich at the expense of the peasants. Universal healthcare is a no brainer. Infrastructure like rail and renewables is a no brainer. Affordable childcare and reasonable wages is a fucking no brainer. UNLESS the incentives for those in power are not aligned with the good of the people.
Democrats don't care that they're not in power, as long as the establishment keeps getting paid.
Now, of course, there can be those like AOC and Sanders who buck that trend. Leaders with those types of values do tend toward the Democratic party. But those are the exceptions. And they can't save us.
Jesus, somewhere there's a GOP party operative that's literally wondering whether or not he paid for that whole screed to depress turnout.
InverseParallax is right, my friend. The Republicans aren't paying you by the word. Next time, just say something stupid like "Both Sides Are The Same!" and keep it down to a single paragraph.