this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
106 points (92.7% liked)

CanadaPolitics

1895 readers
1 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The uninspired mashup between "think of the children" and "state's rights" is fooling people?

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

It's more like "property rights" than "state's rights". A lot of people just kind of quietly believe that they own their kids, as if "owning a human being" doesn't have a name that differs from "parenthood".

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It works because it's essentially hitching it's wagon to a general milieu of reactionary media that a good portion of the country is already immersed in. It doesn't have to be inspired, it just has to reference the various issues these people are already being riled up about.

[–] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Lois Griffin on stage: "Think of the children."

(audience cheers)

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

It also works because parents see schools making mistakes with their kids. Every parent I know has a story about how at least one teacher has done a bad job at something.

With those experiences it's pretty easy to get parents to think they'd provide their kid with more help than the school.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

People will believe anything if they want to believe it.