this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
185 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

69891 readers
2715 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ever heard about software devs not being able to work on personal projects because all the code they produce, even off the clock is owned by their employer?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, what a ultracapitalist dystopian scenario.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadly, it’s not uncommon from what I understand.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Canadian software developer here,

It's really not. Contracts like that in Canada and US haven't been used widely in a long time.

[–] nutt_goblin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Salaried american software developer here. While some large companies have moonlighting carve outs, by and large the rights to any of your work done outside working hours is at the employer's discretion.

(I call out salaried because I think those clauses can vary depending on the structure of your employment)

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My understanding is clauses that own work made outside of work (hours, resources, nonncompeteing scope, ect...) is not enforceable.

But if you do anything related to the company, then it's theirs.

[–] nutt_goblin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, that sounds correct to me.

My interpretation is probably distorted by having worked at big companies that have arms in basically every part of software development so there is no side project programming that is "out of scope" there.

But working at a company with a narrower focus would let you moonlight more freely.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh? That’s great to hear. That means I’m out of date on that. I have a friend who experienced this once.

[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Hasn't been true for my past two jobs at least (US based), what I do outside of company premises / my own hardware and my own time is mine. They only own what was done on company's dime. Not saying it doesn't happen, but that's not my experience so far, and I'm not sure if would be legal.