this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
546 points (98.1% liked)

Flippanarchy

1080 readers
563 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

anarchism is a bit different than breaking things… however whenever there’s a riot, there’s a newscaster yelling “it’s ANARCHY in the streets! pure anarchy!”.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

anarchism is a bit different than breaking things…

If you go back to the Spanish Civil War or the French Revolution, or you look to modern anarchist movements in capitalist states in the Americas and the Pacific Rim?

Anarchist resistance efforts are most successful at spontaneous work stoppages and radical efforts at sabotage. But they're awful at coordinating across wide areas, resisting infiltration, or leveraging economies of scale to expand industrial operations.

Anarchists aren't allows just breaking things. I regularly work with a mix of groups in my local Food Not Bombs chapter. But raising funds, organizing a reliable workforce, and expanding the enterprise is extraordinarily difficult when its just spontaneous organization.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

But they’re awful at coordinating across wide areas, resisting infiltration, or leveraging economies of scale to expand industrial operations.

I would frame it differently. Anarchist organizing is harder than capitalist / centralized socialist organizing. Anarchist still do it because anarchists see it as worth while to try even if it means they might fail more often

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I mean, I'd say the act of going out and wrangling people is (relatively) easier, because there's a general lack of orthodoxy and a bigger focus on revolution as a vibe.

It's keeping them all moving in the same direction, rather than polarizing, infighting, or defecting back to their original political philosophies that's the challenge. Like, getting a bunch of liberals to join a march or protest championed by a few anarchists is borderline trivial. But keeping them around or dissuading them from rushing back to support the most milquetoast moderates is almost impossible.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago

yes i was agreeing with this… maybe you meant to reply to the person i was replying to