this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
178 points (80.5% liked)

science

18668 readers
382 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I didn't realise it wasn't a thing anymore.

I know it's never been a good indicator of success or even cognitive abilities but it's still a thing that people try to measure.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I know it's never been a good indicator of success

I suppose you might define “success” in an unusual way, but IQ is the single highest correlate with income of all factors. Higher than parental income, race, or residential location.

If you’re interesting in learning more I recommend this article. They cite a lot of data and research. I’m happy to walk you through the directionality topic as well if you’re interested.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I may need you to walk me past my inhibitions about accepting scientific information from a website called PumpkinPerson that center justifies its articles.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I just watched a Veritasium video that said that IQ is not very strongly correlated with higher income.

I’ll take a look at the article too.

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there are companies that still use myers-briggs personality tests for "compatibility"

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Myers-Briggs is modern snake oil.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meyers-Briggs is astrology with more steps

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, that is accurate. Astrology pretending to be science.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 1 week ago

It still is a thing, always will be. People are vastly differently skilled. The problem isnt that there are different abilities but that our centralized meat mill pushes them into categories. It doesnt make you better to have more skill in one area, it just means people should consider listening to you.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

IQ is a very good indicator of cognitive abilities. It’s a poor indicator of kindness, morality, or honesty.