this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
37 points (95.1% liked)

Selfhosted

39964 readers
381 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the lght of recent events (gloogel complaining about uBlock) I tried to investigate other available options out there. While Piped.video definitely works, it looks like it is only fluid for popular videos, and as soon as I want to watch something a little more obscure, it is basically impossible, I have infinite wheel spinning.

Have anyone here tried self hosting Piped/ Invidious, and could share a feedback about performance /usability ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xxd@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I selfhosted Invidious a while back, but gave up on it when it stopped working and I couldn't figure out why. I have no experience with Piped.

I settled on a third alternative, but I don't want to point too much attention to it because I think it might be flying under Youtubes' radar at the moment. But let me say this: if you embed a youtube video on a third party site and have it be part of a playlist with only the video in it, you won't see any ads. so for example I'd be embedding a link like this: https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/dQw4w9WgXcQ?playlist=dQw4w9WgXcQ&vq=hd1080&autoplay=1&modestbranding=1&rel=0 on my own page and can then watch it without ads :) if you have any questions, feel free to hit me up.

EDIT: Well, I just got the first ad using this method. So it seems youtube is cracking down on all ad avoidance methods and they found this one too. Only one ad so far, so it doesn't seem to be as bad as their own site, with (sometimes multiple) ads before almost every video, but I'm sure it'll happen. Guess Piped/Invidious it is!

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like a loophole that would be pretty easy to cover from YT? Why would they be so generous and not showing ads in playlists

Wierd lol

[–] xxd@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

yeah I know, makes no sense. I'll use this workaround for as long as possible, but I'm sure I'll have to move to Piped or Invidious sooner or later.

[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Playlists usually don't have eyes watching so businesses don't want to pay for their ads on playlists.

[–] xxd@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

The thing is, I do see ads when I open the embedded video/playlist on youtube! I don't think businesses would specifically avoid embedded playlists, but then happily advertise on playlists on youtube. It just looks like an oversight rather than a business decision to me.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Butbutbut radios don't have eyes watching neither? Lol